Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Machuca v. County of Kern

United States District Court, E.D. California

March 14, 2017

JORGE MACHUCA, Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Defendants.

          SCHEDULING ORDER (FED. R. CIV. P. 16)

          Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         I. Date of Scheduling Conference

         March 14, 2017.

         II. Appearances of Counsel

         Araksya Boyadzhyan[1] appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. James Brannen appeared on behalf of Defendants.

         III. Pleading Amendment Deadline

         Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or motion to amend, no later than June 12, 2017.

         IV. Fictitiously-Named Defendants

         All claims as to “Doe” Defendants, including any counterclaims and cross-claims, are hereby DISMISSED.

         V. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

         The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) on or before March 28, 2017.

         The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before September 15, 2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before November 10, 2017.

         The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses[2], in writing, on or September 25, 2017, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before October 16, 2017. The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

         The provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

         The provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement disclosures and responses to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.