Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Center for Biological Diversity v. Pruitt

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

June 21, 2017

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant.

          JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division LESLIE M. HILL U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Attorneys for Defendant

          Robert Ukeiley, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Law Office of Robert Ukeiley Jonathan Evans Center for Biological Diversity Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

          JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EPA'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

          THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Environmental Health and Defendant Scott Pruitt. in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), hereby stipulate to and request that Court enter an order to extend the deadline for EPA to file its Reply In Support of EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment from August 17, 2017 to August 24, 2017. On February 27, 2017, pursuant to the parties' request for the briefing schedule as set forth in their Joint Case Management Statement (Dkl. No. 32), the Court set the following schedule:

Deadline

Due Date

EPA's Combined Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

July 13, 2017

Plaintiffs' Combined Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

August 3, 2017

EPA's Reply in Support of EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

August 17, 2017

Hearing

September 11, 2017

         The date set for EPA's reply brief, August 17, 2017, conflicts with EPA counsel's recently scheduled vacation. Therefore, the parties respectfully request to reset the deadline to August 24, 2017. This extension will not alter the date of the hearing on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment set for September 11, 2017 or any other event or deadline already fixed by Court order. See Declaration of Leslie M. Hill (attached as Exhibit A).

         Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order resetting the deadline for EPA to file its Reply In Support of EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment to August 24, 2017.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         Pursuant to Stipulation and for good cause shown, the Order Setting Schedule (Dkt. No. 22) is hereby revised as follows:

Deadline

Due Date

EPA's Combined Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

July 13, 2017

Plaintiffs' Combined Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

August 3, 2017

EPA's Reply in Support of EPA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

August 24, 2017

Hearing

September 11, 2017

         IT ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.