United States District Court, N.D. California
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DKT. NOS. 281, 286, 300,
GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.
have filed Administrative Motions to File Under Seal at
Docket Numbers 281, 286, 300, and 314.
motions do not comply with the requirements of Civil Local
Rule 79-5 and/or this Court's Standing Order In Civil
Cases, paragraph 11, with respect to portions related to
plaintiffs' personal information as follows:
seeks to remove a document from the record without making a
motion to file under seal an unredacted version of the
does not include a declaration establishing that the
documents sought to be filed under seal, or portions thereof,
are sealable under the standard appropriate to the underlying
motion. Reference to a stipulation or protective order that
allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential
is not sufficient to establish that documents, or portions
thereof, are sealable. See Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A);
Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 565 F.3d 1106,
1115-16 (9th Cir. 2009); Kamakana v. City & County of
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.2006).
does not include proposed order that is narrowly tailored to
seal only the sealable material, and which lists in table
format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be
sealed. See Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(B).
does not include a proposed order that conforms to this
Court's Standing Order in Civil Cases, paragraph 11 (as
set forth in Appendix A to this Order).
does not include redacted version of the document that is
sought to be filed under seal or indicate that the submitting
party is seeking to file the entire document under seal.
See Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(C).
does not include an unredacted version of the document sought
to be filed under seal which indicates, by highlighting or
other clear method, the portions of the document that have
been omitted from the redacted version. See Civ. L.
no timely declaration from the Designating Party establishing
that all of the designated material is sealable, with regards
to Docket Numbers 300 and 314. See Civ. L. R.
79-5(e)(1) (declaration must be provided within four (4) days
of filing of the motion).
supporting declarations submitted by Designating Party do not
clearly indicate whether they support the motion to seal in
whole or in part, with regards to Docket Numbers 170, 205,
208. See Standing Order in Civil Cases, paragraph
do not include an updated proposed order reflecting
only those portions for which a declaration establishing a
basis for sealing has been submitted after the time has
passed for the Designating Party to file its declaration
under Civ. L. R. 79-5(e)(1) that conforms with this
Court's Standing Order in Civil Cases, paragraph 11, with
regards to Docket Numbers 281, 286, 300, and 314.
are directed to file supplemental documents to cure the
defects identified above no later than Wednesday, July 12,
2017. Failure to do so may ...