Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California

July 12, 2017

WAYMO LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

          ORDER RE: WAYMO'S MOTION TO COMPEL Re: Dkt. Nos. 681, 682, 747, 748, 749

          JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

         Waymo seeks the production of certain documents and answers to interrogatories from Uber and Otto Trucking.

         A.Waymo's Expedited Document Requests

         1. RFP No. 5

         Uber objects to producing emails that are responsive to Waymo's request for diligence documents on the grounds that such documents are not appropriate for expedited discovery. However, it also acknowledges that Waymo requested such documents pursuant to RFP No. 28 in a non-expedited discovery request and that it responded to such request on June 23. Uber does not disclose whether it produced such documents. If it has not, it shall. The documents are relevant to what information Otto shared with Uber and therefore are relevant to Waymo's trade secret claims.

         2. RFP No. 8

         Documents responsive to Waymo's request for documents regarding “Pre-Signing Bad Acts” are relevant. Uber contends that it does not have any non-privileged responsive documents. To the extent any such documents have not previously been placed on a privilege log Uber shall do so now. Uber has not shown that the amount of such documents is so voluminous that it cannot comply with its well-established obligation to log documents it is withholding on privilege grounds.

         3. RFP No. 10

         Uber has agreed to produce all lab notebooks belonging to personnel who worked on LiDAR.

         4. RFP No. 20

         Uber objects on the grounds of relevancy to production of software modules that were part of the intellectual property identified in the Put Call Agreement Disclosure Schedules. The objection is overruled. Otto's intellectual property disclosed to Uber is discoverable as it is relevant to Waymo's claims and Uber's defenses.

         5. RFP No. 25

         Uber has satisfactorily responded to Waymo's request for closing conditions.

         B. Waymo's ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.