Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

A.K. v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California

May 7, 2018

A.K. female, A.S., and A.K. male, and ALESHNA KUMARI, Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; JESSE CORTEZ, an individual; JANELLE GONZALEZ, an individual; LEONA WILLIAMS, an individual; EVELYN MARTIN, an individual; ANTHONY MARTIN, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants.

          STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference was held on May 7, 2018. Joe Rapoport appeared as counsel for plaintiffs, and Amanda McDermott appeared as counsel for defendants. Following the conference, the court enters this Order.

         I. SERVICE OF PROCESS

         All defendants have been served. Plaintiffs have until May 8, 2018 to amend their Complaint so as to remove defendants Evelyn Martin and Anthony Martin.

         II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS

         After the Amended Complaint is filed, no further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings will be permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).

         III. JURISDICTION/VENUE

         Jurisdiction is predicated upon federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, because plaintiffs' claims arise under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Venue is undisputed and hereby found to be proper.

         IV. DISCOVERY

         The parties shall serve the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) on or before June 15, 2018.

         The parties shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than February 7, 2019. With regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before February 28, 2019.

         All other discovery, including depositions for preservation of testimony, is left open, save and except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed by May 28, 2019. The word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge's calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and so that such motions may be heard (and any resulting orders obeyed) not later than March 29, 2019.

         V. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

         All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before June 24, 2019. All motions shall be noticed for the next available hearing date. Counsel are cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.