Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield

United States District Court, E.D. California

May 30, 2018

GILBERTO FAJARDO, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., Defendants.

          SCHEDULING (FED. R. CIV. P. 16)

          JENNIFER L. THURSTON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         I. Date of Scheduling Conference

         May 25, 2018.

         II. Appearances of Counsel

         David Cohn appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

         Heather Cohen appeared on behalf of Defendants.

         III. Pleading Amendment Deadline

         Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or motion to amend, no later than September 14, 2018.

         IV. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

         The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) on or before June 18, 2018.

         The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before June 18, 2019, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before August 12, 2019.

         The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or June 28, 2019, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before July 29, 2019. The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

         The provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

         The provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement disclosures and responses to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.