Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Real Property Located at 5383 Stonehurst Drive

United States District Court, E.D. California

September 11, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5383 STONEHURST DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, APN 367-230-018-7, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, et al., Defendants.

          McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney ANDRE M. ESPINOZA KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the United States

          UNITED STATES' REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A JOINT STATUS REPORT FROM SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 TO NOVEMBER 12, 2019

          JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

         The United States submits the following Request to Extend the Deadline to file a Joint Status Report from September 12, 2019 to November 12, 2019.

         Introduction

         On April 15, 2019, the United States filed a civil forfeiture complaint in rem against fourteen real properties (“defendant properties”) connected to fraud and money laundering crimes in the Eastern District of California and other areas. All known potential claimants to the defendant properties were served in a manner consistent with Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161, 168 (2002) and the applicable statutory authority. Furthermore, public notice on the official internet government forfeiture site, www.forfeiture.gov, began on May 4, 2019, and ran for thirty consecutive days, as required by Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions. See ECF No. 4. A Declaration of Publication was filed on July 12, 2019, which set forth, among other items, that publication on the government's forfeiture website was complete on June 2, 2019. See Dkt. 40.

         The United States has also lodged the complaint on the bankruptcy docket for DC Solar's parent company, In re Double Jump Inc., Case 19-bk-50102, a bankruptcy case filed in Reno, Nevada after the United States executed federal search and seizure warrants at DC Solar's business and other locations in California associated with the company and its founders. The United States' application for a restraining order, Dkt. 42, describes the United States' law enforcement action, the subsequent Reno bankruptcy filings, DC Solar's reorganization efforts, the conversion from a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case to a Chapter 7, and recent litigation involving the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee.

         Good Cause

         The United States has provided notice to all potential claimants pursuant to law. Specifically, the defendant properties are collectively owned by Jeffrey and Paulette Carpoff personally and through several LLCs, Dora Dog Properties, LLC, Dog Blue Properties, LLC, 475 Channel Road, LLC, 2750 Maxwell Way, LLC, Fou Dog, LLC, Antioch Mini Storage, LLC, and 4021 Pike Lane, LLC. The government served copies of the complaint documents on the above LLCs through their registered agent for service of process, as listed on the California Secretary of State's website. Further, the government served copies of the complaint on the principals of each respective LLC, Jeffrey and Paulette Carpoff. Lastly, the government has provided notice of this action to the lienholders who are identified on chain-of-title documents and may have a security interest in the defendant properties.

         Five parties have so far appeared in the case. First, the only parties who have asserted an ownership interest, Jeff and Paulette Carpoff, filed claims as to each property in their personal capacity and through their LLCs. See Dkt. 27-28. Second, a bank filed claims concerning outstanding loans as relates to two In Rem Defendants (2750 Maxwell Way and 4021 Pike Lane) currently being sold by the U.S. Marshals Service, as discussed below. Dkt. 6-7. Third, a construction company filed a claim and answer associated with labor/materials supplied in connection with retaining walls installed at one of the In Rem Defendants. Dkt. 37. Fourth, Dish Network, a provider of cable and television services, filed a claim concerning its month-to-month tenancy at one of the In Rem Defendants. Dkt. 33. Lastly, the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) filed a claim to several of the In Rem Defendants based on alleged taxes owed to the FTB by Jeff and Paulette Carpoff Dkt. 35. The FTB and Daysh Development filed answers.

         No other party has filed an answer. However, based on the claimants' requests for additional time to review the allegations and potential privilege issues and other defenses, and given the lengthy facts and complicated issues in this case, the United States has agreed to their requests for more time. The answers are currently due on October 15, 2019.

         Furthermore, several potential tax equity investor-victims and the Chapter 7 and 11 bankruptcy trustees have requested extensions of time to file claims in this case. The United States granted each request and they currently have until October 7, 2019 to file a claim in the case.

         To allow the above individuals, entities, investors, and trustees sufficient time to file a claim and research the issues raised by the facts alleged in the Complaint, the United States seeks to continue the deadline to file a Joint Status Report from September 12, 2019 to November 12, 2019 (or to another date the Court deems appropriate).

         Accordingly, there is good cause to extend the deadline to file a joint status report in this case from September 12, 2019 to November 12, 2019, or to a date the Court deems appropriate.

         U.S. Marshals' Efforts to Manage and Sell In Rem Defendants 2750 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.