Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hill v. Goodfellow Top Grade

United States District Court, N.D. California

September 13, 2019

TRINA HILL, Plaintiff,
v.
GOODFELLOW TOP GRADE, Defendant.

          JURY VERDICT FORM

         We the jury in the above-entitled action find the following answers to the questions submitted to us:

         PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS

         I. RACE/SEX DISCRIMINATION-DISPARATE TREATMENT

         1. Has the plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff's race was the sole reason for the defendant's decision to take an adverse employment action against her?

         Yes___ No ___

         If the answer to Question No. 1 is “yes, ” proceed to Question No. 5. If the answer to Question No. 1 is “No, ” proceed to Question No. 2.

         2. Has the plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff's race was a motivating factor for the defendant's decision to take an adverse employment action against her?

         Yes No

         If the answer to Question No. 2 is “yes, ” proceed to Question No. 3. If the answer to Question No. 2 is “No, ” proceed to Question No. 5.

         3. Has the defendant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant's decision to take an adverse employment action against the plaintiff was also motivated by a lawful reason?

         Yes No

         If the answer to Question No. 3 is “yes, ” proceed to Question No. 4. If the answer to Question No. 3 is “No, ” proceed to Question No. 5.

         4. Has the defendant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant would have made the same decision to take an adverse employment action even if the plaintiff's race had played no role in the defendant's decision to take an adverse employment action against the plaintiff?

         Yes No

         Proceed to Question No. 5

         5. Has the plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff's sex was the sole reason for the defendant's decision to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.