United States District Court, N.D. California
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
the Initial Case Management Conference held on November 7,
2019, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Deadline to Move to Amend Pleadings:
April 28, 2020
Fact Discovery Cut-Off:
July 6, 2020
Expert Witness Disclosures:
July 13, 2020
Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures:
August 3, 2020
Expert Discovery Cutoff:
August 17, 2020
Deadline for Hearing Dispositive Motions:
August 20, 2020
parties are referred to the Court's ADR Unit for a
mediation to occur in the next 120 days.
further Case Management Conference is scheduled for March 26,
2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San
Francisco, CA. An updated Joint Case Management Conference
Statement is due March 19, 2020.
trial will begin on October 19, 2020, at 8:30 a.m., in
Courtroom F, 15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden
Gate, San Francisco, California.
Court is expecting the length of the trial to not exceed 5
Pretrial Conference shall be held on October 1, 2020, at 2:00
p.m., in Courtroom F, 15th Floor. Lead trial counsel for each
party shall attend.
least seven days prior to date of the Final Pretrial
Conference the parties shall do the following:
1. In lieu of preparing a Joint Pretrial Conference
Statement, the parties shall meet and confer in person, and
then prepare and file a jointly signed Proposed Final
Pretrial Order that contains: (a) a brief description of the
substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided;
(b) a statement of all relief sought; (c) all stipulated
facts; (d) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including
a brief description of the exhibit and Bates numbers, a blank
column for when it will be offered into evidence, a blank
column for when it may be received into evidence, and a blank
column for any limitations on its use; and (e) each
party's separate witness list for its case-in-chief
witnesses (including those appearing by deposition),
including, for all such witnesses (other than party
plaintiffs or defendants), a short statement of the substance
of his/her testimony and, separately, what, if any,
non-cumulative testimony the witness will offer. For each
witness, state an hour/minute time estimate for the direct
examination (only). Items (d) and (e) should be submitted as
appendices to the proposed order. The proposed order should
also state which issues, if any, are for the Court to decide,
rather than the jury.
2. File a joint set of proposed instructions on substantive
issues of law arranged in a logical sequence. If undisputed,
an instruction shall be identified as “Stipulated
Instruction No. __ Re __, ” with the blanks filled in
as appropriate. If disputed, each version of the instruction
shall be inserted together, back to back, in their logical
place in the overall sequence. Each such disputed instruction
shall be identified as, for example, “Disputed
Instruction No. __ Re __ Offered by __, ” with the
blanks filled in as appropriate. All disputed versions of the
same basic instruction shall bear the same number. Any
modifications to a form instruction must be plainly
identified. If a party does not have a counter version and
simply contends that no such instruction in any version
should be given, then that party should so state (and explain
why) on a separate page inserted in lieu of an alternate
version. With respect to form preliminary instructions,
general instructions, or concluding instructions, please
simply cite to the numbers of the requested instructions in
the current edition of the Ninth Circuit Model Jury
Instructions. Other than citing the numbers, the parties
shall not include preliminary, general, or concluding
instructions in the packet.
3. File a separate memorandum of law in support of each
party's disputed instructions, if any, organized by
4. File a joint set of proposed voir dire questions
supplemented as necessary by separate requests.
5. File trial briefs on any controlling issues of law.
6. File proposed verdict forms, joint or separate.
7. File and serve any objections to exhibits.
8. File a joint simplified Statement of the Case to be read
to the jury during voir dire as part of the proposed jury
instructions. Unless the case is extremely complex, ...